Vehicle access
Daily, weekly, and monthly e-bike rental for riders who need a work vehicle without buying one upfront.
July 2026
Investor proposal01 / 12
US$100K pre-seed round
Supported e-bike rentals for delivery riders.
Ebike PH rents work-ready e-bikes and operates the service layer around the vehicle: maintenance, battery support, handover proof, payment cadence, and collections.
Round
US$100K
US$2M post-money SAFE target
Deployment target
100 bikes
staged proof cluster target
Founder capital
US$2K
capital invested before outside round
Paid-customer proof
22 CRM rows
PHP 2,808 CRM-verified gross; 18 PayMongo paid
Application packet
Business-plan link, founder contact details, traction proof, and round terms in one investor-facing surface.
Company
Ebike PH
Registered country
Philippines (PH)
Founder / CEO
Kai Shen
CEO phone
+60 11 2195 0881
Founder email
eekaishen@gmail.com
Market
Philippines delivery riders
Rider Wedge
Problem02 / 12
The gap
Cheap e-bikes are easy to buy. Reliable work-bike operation is the hard part.
For delivery riders, downtime means lost income. The opportunity is not hardware retail; it is managed access, fast maintenance, spare parts, payment control, and reliable after-sales support.
Uptime operation
Maintenance, spare parts, battery support, GPS visibility, handover proof, and rider support around the bike.
Payment control
Deposit, rental receipts, billing cadence, and ledger review to keep fleet cashflow visible.
Rider onboarding
Application, identity review, plan selection, handover evidence, and CRM operations workflow.
Timing
Why now03 / 12
Why now
The timing is good only if EBike PH stays narrow and measurable.
A broad EV story is not enough. The investable timing is the combination of active delivery-rider work modes, rider cashflow pressure, and a funding market that rewards payback discipline.
The round should buy evidence, not vanity fleet size.
Platform fit
foodpanda PH accepts bicycle, motorcycle, e-scooter, and walker delivery modes.
Rider cashflow
Work-vehicle access is still a cash constraint for riders who need earning uptime.
Investor filter
Mobility investors now punish growth-first fleet stories without payback discipline.
Execution window
A small proof cluster can validate utilization, collections, repairs, and route control before scale.
Why This Wedge
Market04 / 12
Investor lens
The entry point is narrow by design: earn uptime for delivery riders first.
This should not read like a broad EV rollout. The first investable thesis is one dense delivery-rider operating loop: acquire the rider, keep the bike earning, collect payments, and control losses.
A financed bike sale helps a qualified buyer own hardware. EBike PH sells lower-friction access and service-backed earning uptime.
Beachhead
Dense Metro Manila delivery routes, BGC-first operating hypothesis
Customer
Delivery riders who need earning uptime without buying a vehicle upfront
Alternatives
Cash purchase, financed bike sale, informal rental, motorcycle
EBike PH wedge
Rental access plus uptime support, tracking, payment cadence, and maintenance
Why an investor should keep reading
The business is asset-backed and operationally hard, but the first proof loop is measurable: utilization, collection cadence, downtime, repairs, loss rate, and rider retention.
Alternatives + Plan To Win
Competition05 / 12
Competitive reality
Riders already have alternatives. EBike PH must win on managed uptime.
The company should not claim a blank market. The sharper claim is that existing options leave gaps around upfront cash, repairs, tracking, and collections.
Alternative
Strength
Gap
EBike PH response
Cash purchase
Lowest long-term cost for riders with capital.
High upfront cash burden and rider-owned maintenance risk.
Rental access with maintenance cadence and payment visibility.
Financed sale
Ownership path for qualified borrowers.
Credit qualification, down payment, repossession friction.
Shorter commitment and service-backed earning uptime.
Informal rental
Fast access and familiar local behavior.
Weak tracking, weak collections, inconsistent repairs.
GPS, handover proof, ledger, and spare-parts workflow.
Motorcycle
Higher speed and range.
Higher entry cost, fuel exposure, and license/vehicle burden.
Dense-zone e-bike work loops where uptime and cost matter.
First Paid Rider
Proof06 / 12
What changed
First paid rider proof, not just a concept story.
Early proof only: one rider accepted a supported work bike and made rental payments. It is not yet proof of scaled demand.
Demand signal
72 raw Meta lead signals; 38 deduped review items
Paid proof
First anonymized paid rider with work-bike handover evidence
Payment proof
22 CRM paid verification rows; PHP 2,808 gross verified
Product proof
Live rider site, login flow, CRM workflow, and payment ledger
Anonymized rider case study
Customer
Delivery rider, anonymized
Use case
Work-bike rental for delivery income
Visible cadence
Daily rental rows at PHP 200
Case ledger
12 received rows: 11 rentals and 1 deposit
Evidence window
Late June to early July 2026 ledger proof
Privacy rule
Face blurred; no customer ID or phone shown
Ledger + Workflow
Evidence07 / 12
Operating system
The proof is the workflow around the bike.
Investor risk moves from rider demand uncertainty toward measurable operating questions: collection cadence, downtime, maintenance cost, retention, and payback.
Pricing + Unit Economics
Model08 / 12
Rider pricing
Simple plans that match rider cashflow.
Daily
PHP 200
highest flexibility
Weekly
PHP 1,200
cashflow discount
Monthly
PHP 4,500
best committed rate
Model outputs from current operating plan
Modeled scale cases, not historical revenue.
| Scale | Util. | Revenue | Cash | Return |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 bikes | 80% | US$6.7K / mo | US$2.5K / mo | 40.2% annualized cash return |
| 500 bikes | 80% | US$33K / mo | US$21K / mo | 17.5-month payback; 68.7% annualized cash return |
What Must Be Proven
Diligence09 / 12
IC questions
A decent proposal tells investors what is still unproven.
The current materials are now strong enough for a first meeting only if they stay disciplined: show proof, label modeled numbers, and make the next evidence-gates explicit.
Diligence package score
100 / 100
Package completeness, not a claim that execution risk is gone.
Every claim should be one of: proved by live EBike PH evidence, modeled for the proof cluster, or still open for diligence.
Investor question
Is rider demand real?
72 raw Meta lead signals, 38 deduped review items, 11 legal applications, first paid rider.
Next proof
Clean lead-to-test-ride, test-ride-to-paid conversion, and week-2 retention.
Investor question
Can unit economics survive operations?
22 CRM paid rows; PHP 2,808 gross verified. PayMongo-only cross-check: 18 payments, PHP 2,406.
Next proof
Reconcile provider totals, then confirm landed cost, repair reserve, downtime, and missed-payment rate.
Investor question
Can route and compliance risk be controlled?
Confirmed road restrictions; BGC/Y16 route fit remains open.
Next proof
Finalize route pack, no-go roads, vehicle-class review, and rider briefing.
Use of Funds
Round10 / 12
Ask
Raising US$100K to stage the first 100-bike proof cluster.
The round funds operating proof, not a broad national rollout. The next investment decision should be based on measured utilization, cash collection, maintenance cost, downtime, and rider retention.
Now
First paid customer proof
Bike handover, app workflow, payment ledger.
Next
100-bike cluster
Validate utilization, collections, maintenance, retention.
Then
500-bike expansion decision
Scale after repeatable collection, uptime, and payback.
100-Bike Evidence Gates
Proof plan11 / 12
What US$100K must buy
The first cluster should create a decision memo for scale.
The next round is justified only if the pilot produces clean evidence across demand, unit economics, operations, and expansion discipline.
No hidden 500-bike jump
500 bikes should be an expansion decision after proof, not a claim inside the current raise.
Gate
Demand
Current
72 raw Meta lead signals; 38 deduped review items; 11 legal applications; one paid rider.
Next evidence
Qualified leads, test rides, paid conversions, week-2 retention.
Gate
Economics
Current
22 CRM paid rows, PHP 2,808 gross verified; Y16 component list subtotal USD 870.30.
Next evidence
Provider reconciliation, landed cost, warranty, repair reserve, downtime, missed-payment rate.
Gate
Operations
Current
1 active bike assignment, GPS normal, 6 handover acknowledgements, CRM workflow.
Next evidence
Launch-zone route pack, no-go roads, rider briefing workflow, maintenance log.
Gate
Scale
Current
100-bike proof target; 500-bike expansion modeled.
Next evidence
Expand only after collection, uptime, payback, and retention thresholds.
Next Step
Founder12 / 12
Founder
Built by an operator with mobility and fleet experience.
Kai Shen has worked across early-stage mobility, logistics, and fleet operations, including Mobike Southeast Asia operations, Rybit delivery-rider fleet work in the US, and Flash Malaysia logistics execution.
The current round is for disciplined proof: utilization, collections, maintenance, downtime, and rider retention.
Data-room notes
Design system version: 2026-06-20-locked-color-board. Public proof assets are sanitized for investor review. Customer raw ID, payment references, and direct contact details are intentionally excluded.
Contact
eekaishen@gmail.com
+60 11 2195 0881
01 / 12